offspring

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Hot food off Plastic plates....

Eating hot food off plastic plates can increase the risk of kidney stones

  • Heating melamine crockery may harm health 
  • Acidic foods can also encourage cheap or old melamine products to contaminate food
By Anna Hodgekiss
|

Its is a favourite of parents and picnic-goers the world over. But new research suggests that eating hot meals on melamine crockery could actually be harmful to health. 

Taiwanese researchers have found that hot temperatures increase the amount of melamine we are exposed to - and this can increase the risk of kidney stones.

They studied two groups of people who ate piping hot noodle soup. One group ate from melamine bowls, the other from ceramic bowls.

People who eat hot food (such as noodle soup) from melamine bowls may increase their risk of kidney stones
People who eat hot food (such as noodle soup) from melamine bowls may increase their risk of kidney stones

Urine samples were collected before the meal, and every two hours for 12 hours following the meal.

Three weeks later, the volunteers consumed the same kind of soup but the type of bowl they used was reversed. Urine samples were collected again. 

Total melamine levels in urine for 12 hours after eating the soup was 8.35 micrograms when the participants ate out of the melamine bowls versus about 1.3 micrograms when they ate out of ceramic bowls. 

Lead researcher by Chia-Fang Wu, of Kaohsiung Medical University in Taiwan, said: 'Melamine tableware may release large amounts of melamine when used to serve high-temperature foods.'

Previous research has found a link between melamine and kidney stones (pictured) in both children and adults
Previous research has found a link between melamine and kidney stones (pictured) in both children and adults

He noted that both higher temperatures (from hot soups, for example) or more acidic foods can encourage melamine to contaminate food, especially in older or low-quality kitchenware. 

But he added that the amount of melamine released into food and beverages from melamine tableware varies by brand, so the results of this study of one brand may not be generalised to other brands.

However the results suggest it is advisable to serve hot food on ceramic crockery, to be on the safe side. 

They added that it's not yet clear what effect all of this might have on human health. However, prior studies have linked chronic, low-dose melamine exposures to an increased risk for kidney stones in both children and adults, the researchers said. 

The findings back up previous research that found a link between melamine and kidney stones in both children and adults.

Studies of melamine toxicity in animals indicate that ingestion can cause kidney stones, kidney damage and may induce cancer.

And in 2008, melamine-tainted baby formula (causing an especially high dose) was linked to six deaths and 50,000 hospitalizations related to kidney stones and kidney disease in China.

The study was published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2266472/Eating-hot-food-plastic-plates-increase-risk-kidney-stones.html#ixzz2IoYYWwrN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Monday, January 21, 2013

Choosing a good password

How bad spelling and grammar could be the key to choosing a good password

  • Researchers say that good grammar makes passwords far easier to crack
  • Warn against using sentences as passwords
By Mark Prigg
|
Birthdays, pet names and your place of birth are already huge no-nos when choosing a secure password.

But researchers said today that the key to finding more secure passwords could be straightforward - just don't use good grammar or spelling.

Ashwini Rao and colleagues at Carnegie Mellon University researched the current generation of password cracking systems.

Researchers say that spelling mistakes and bad grammar can actually be an advantage in passwords, making them harder to crack
Researchers say that spelling mistakes and bad grammar can actually be an advantage in passwords, making them harder to crack

They found that many people, on being asked to choose longer passwords, made them just as easy to guess.

'Use of long sentence-like or phrase-like passwords such as 'abiggerbetterpassword' and 'thecommunistfairy' is increasing,' the researchers say in their paper, due to be presented at the Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy in San Antonio, Texas, next month.
 
The researchers say that other types of familiar structures like postal addresses, email addresses and URLs may also make for less secure passwords, even if they are long.

They say bad grammar can make a huge difference, as hackers are increasingly searching for passwords using correct grammar and spellings in 'brute force' attacks that simply run through combinations of words in a dictionary.

Incorrect spelling and grammar can fool many of these attacks, the team found.

Misspelling your passwords is actually a big advantage, researchers have found (as long as you can remember it)
Misspelling your passwords is actually a big advantage, researchers have found (as long as you can remember it)

'Using an analytical model based on Parts-of-Speech tagging we show that the decrease in search space due to the presence of grammatical structures can be as high as 50%. '
They found that in general, asking users for longer passwords didn't work.

'A significant result of our work is that the strength of long passwords does not increase uniformly with length,' they said.

The team also developed an algorithm to improve the cracking of long passwords.

CHOOSING A SAFE PASSWORD

 Research firm SplashData suggests making passwords more secure with these tips:

  • Use passwords of eight characters or more with mixed types of characters.
  • For example, 'eat cake at 8!' or 'car_park_city?'
  • Avoid using the same username/password combination for multiple websites.
  • Especially risky is using the same password for entertainment sites that you do for online email, social networking, and financial services.

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Migraines....

Migraines are the second biggest risk factor for women suffering a heart attack or stroke

  • Severe migraines with visual disturbances, known as aura, are the second biggest risk factor
  • Only high blood pressure was a bigger factor
  • Findings come from 15 year study of 27,860 women
By James Rush
|
Women who suffer from severe migraines accompanied by visual disturbances may be at an increased risk of heart attacks and stroke.

Scientists have said only high blood pressure was a bigger indicator of a stroke or heart attack than migraines with aura, as the condition is known when accompanied by vision problems including flashing lights.

The landmark 15-year study followed 27,860 women, of who 1,435 had migraine with aura.
Women who suffer from severe migraines are at an increased risk of suffering a heart attack or stroke, according to the study
Women who suffer from severe migraines are at an increased risk of suffering a heart attack or stroke, according to the study

While previous studies have suggested migraine with aura is linked to a doubling of the risk of a stroke or heart attack, never before has it been named as the second biggest factor.

Over the years there were 1,030 cases of heart attack, stroke or death from a cardiovascular ailment, according to the report from the American Academy of Neurology.
 
Study author Dr Tobias Kurth said: 'After high blood pressure, migraine with aura was the second strongest single contributor to risk of heart attacks and strokes.

'It came ahead of diabetes, current smoking, obesity, and family history of early heart disease.'

Only high blood pressure was a bigger indicator of heart attacks or strokes, the study found
Only high blood pressure was a bigger indicator of heart attacks or strokes, the study found

Dr Kurth, of the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and the French National Institute of Health, is also a fellow of the American Academy of Neurology.

He said the risk for migraine-plagued women with aura was three times greater than for those with migraines that lacked this disturbance.

A second study released by the same academy said women who had migraines with aura and took hormonal contraceptives were more likely to have blood clots.

Both studies will be presented at the academy's annual meeting in March in San Diego, California.

Friday, January 4, 2013

A diet to cure Cancer


Sorry, but there's no such thing as a diet that cures cancer

Professor Karol Sikora
|
Yesterday, The Marchioness of Worcester announced that an ‘alkaline diet’ — free from alcohol, meat and processed food — had helped her beat cancer.
Here, in an open letter to the Marchioness, eminent cancer specialist Professor Karol Sikora argues that this diet has no power against  the disease — and could  even prove harmful.

Dear Tracy Worcester,

Tracy Worcester has 'never felt better' after following an alkaline diet
Tracy Worcester has 'never felt better' after following an alkaline diet

This week I was so glad to read that you have ‘never felt better’ three years after treatment for breast cancer.
At the end of the day, that is the only thing that matters.
But I have to be honest. 

I don’t agree you owe it all to complementary medicine and ‘alkalining’ your body by eating a diet low in acidic foods.
When it comes to the alkaline diet for cancer patients, I am sceptical.

I’m not averse to patients trying anything — within reason. 

Two of my patients, on their own initiative, are using the alkaline diet, which claims to halt the spread of cancer by making the body fluids more acidic, and they both tell me that it has helped them feel better. 

But I must say there is no evidence that it has made any real difference at all.
Both my patients have done well and treatment is working, but there is no way of telling if they would have done worse without an alkaline diet. 

Cancer therapy these days can be very effective and we expect good results more often than not.
The only way to prove the diet works would be to carry a randomised controlled trial on many different patients — some of whom use it and others who don’t.
As far as I know, that has never been done. 

The alkaline diet, which has its origins in the Twenties, is a loose name for lots of different related diets. 

Lots of people claim to have designed their own version of this diet, but so far none of them have come up with any real evidence that it works.
 
The concept of an alkaline diet starts with the premise that cancer cells thrive in acidic environments — possibly because this encourages cell mutation — and will shrink and die in alkaline environments. 

Our bodies are normally very slightly alkaline — with a pH of 7.2.
So the idea is you eat lots of alkaline foods, such as squash, lettuce, tomatoes, celery, carrots, onions, chickpeas, spinach, cucumber, basil, parsley, olive oil, lemons, limes and watermelons to raise your pH level to around 8. 

At the same time, you avoid acidic foods such as sugar, meat, dairy products, white rice and pasta and cut out coffee and alcohol.

In fact, if you test your urine on this kind of regime, you may well find that your urine levels are more alkaline than normal. So far, so effective. 

But there are two problems. The first is that the basic premise — that cancer cells thrive in acidic surroundings — is controversial.
Yes, it can be shown in a laboratory, but it has never been shown in human patients.
Fresh spinach
Tomatoes drizzled with olive oil
The idea is that you eat lots of alkaline foods, such as spinach, tomatoes and olive oil, to raise your pH level to around 8

And what happens in a test tube is often very far removed from real practice.
The second thing is the body itself balances pH levels. It doesn’t matter what you eat.

If your pH level rises, the body can alter this back to normal using mechanisms like increasing the pace of breathing and excreting more alkaline through the kidneys. 

The pH balance of the body cannot be changed for any meaningful length of time. Yes, your urine may be more alkaline, but that just shows your body is adjusting and excreting excess alkaline content. 

Looking at you now — glowing with good health — it seems likely that you used a balanced form of the alkaline diet alongside conventional treatments and this is probably the best way to do it.

In theory, the alkaline diet is quite a healthy diet, but not for the reasons you think — and it can’t claim to beat cancer.
It involves increasing your intake of vegetables which are packed with beneficial antioxidants that help to mop up damaging free radicals in the blood.

It also means avoiding saturated fat, which will improve your heart health and reduce levels of bad cholesterol.
But, unfortunately, there are more extreme versions of the alkaline diet which may cause health problems. 

The first priority should always be to make sure you are getting sufficient calories if you are undergoing treatment for cancer — around 2,000 a day.
Any diet which restricts calories is a bad idea.

A balanced version of the alkaline diet does not mean cutting down on the amount of food consumed — just switching to more vegetables and fish instead of pasta and meat — but more extreme versions could mean someone finds it difficult to get enough calories.

I’m also concerned about alkaline diets which cut out all dairy — not the sort you followed where you cut out alcohol, meat and processed food — because this is an important source of vitamin D, vital for bone health. 

Many types of chemotherapy can lead to brittle bones and although we now have medications to try to prevent this, it is important to maintain a diet which is high in calcium and vitamin D. 

You can eat fish and eggs on the alkaline diet, but not red meat. This is also a rich source of iron which is needed for healthy blood production
You can eat fish and eggs on the alkaline diet, but not red meat. This is also a rich source of iron which is needed for healthy blood production

There are also studies that show vitamin D can extend cancer survival rates, although it is not going to cure you if you have metastatic cancer which has spread to the bones already. 

Many sources of protein — which is vital for healthy tissue repair — are restricted or excluded on alkaline diets.
You can eat fish and eggs on the alkaline diet, but not red meat. This is also a rich source of iron which is needed for healthy blood production.

I would hate other cancer patients to start thinking that a radical diet would be a magic bullet because it seemed to work for you, Tracy.

The alkaline diet is not the only questionable cancer-busting diet out there.
I have looked at quite a few faddy diets which claim to help cancer patients over the 40 years I have been practising as an oncologist. 

Some involve eating a huge amount of something like watercress or beans or going to great lengths to avoid certain foods such as dairy products or eggs.
Some people also believe that eating times should be rigidly fixed around the body clock. 

Some eat nothing but sardines and brazil nuts or take a spoonful of bicarbonate of soda with every meal. I can honestly say I have never found one that does what it claims to do. 

Mostly, these diets help people who want to feel they are ‘doing something’ to help themselves when they have a life-threatening disease.

I recently visited the Gerson Clinic in Tijuana, Mexico, where patients — mainly Americans — are on very strict onerous regimes involving having raw carrot juice every hour and coffee enemas.

The clinic overlooks the Pacific Ocean and it is used mainly by people who have run out of other avenues to explore and are already very ill.
It seemed to me the lives of the patients were severely restricted by these measures, when they already had little time left. You could actually say the diet was damaging their quality of life and the quality of life of their nearest and dearest. 

The people who run the clinic say they have evidence that Gerson therapy works, but I can’t find any evidence of scientific credibility.

The link between diet and cancer is complicated, and scientists have not yet unravelled the exact mechanisms involved.

This is because diets are made up of different foods containing many nutrients that interact in different ways in individuals. 

As a general rule, I recommend my patients eat bland foods to settle the stomach and eat little and often if they don’t have the appetite for larger meals.
It is wise to eat more fruit and vegetables and unrefined cereals and to minimise your intake of alcohol. 

You only need two or three portions of red meat each week to stay healthy and you should limit the amount of salt you eat.
But there is no evidence that foods can boost cancer treatment success rates or the effectiveness of chemotherapy.

Another advocate of changing your diet as a cure for cancer is Dr Julian Kenyon, who runs the Dove Clinic for Integrated Medicine in Hampshire and offers help to cancer patients in extremis. 

However, his therapeutic regimes includes some questionable treatments, including elimination diets and photodynamic therapy, which is when diseased cells are exposed to light which causes a series of events in the cell, leading to their destruction.


Certainly, trying to find a cure at the Dove Clinic can cost each patient up to £20,000 — which may be a big financial strain.

I never want to take away hope from my patients and I’m happy for people to explore all avenues to help themselves.
I’ve got one patient who goes jogging after each chemotherapy session and he says it makes him feel great. 

Another eats porridge before she has chemotherapy and says it helps her not to feel sick. 

But doctors have to be careful not to give patients false hope.
The idea there is any magic diet out there which can improve quality of life on chemotherapy or extend survival rates is, I’m sorry to say, a myth.

Yours, Professor Karol Sikora

Professor Karol Sikora is a consultant oncologist based at Hammersmith Hospital in  London and is the founder of cancerpartnersuk.org, a network  of cancer treatment centres.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2255445/Marchioness-Worcester-Sorry-theres-thing-diet-cures-cancer.html#ixzz2H1T2X5MB
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Einstein

Socrates

Confucious

 

blogger templates 3 columns | Make Money Online