offspring

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Spending more than six hours sitting each day.....

Sitting at your desk for six hours a day dramatically increases the risk of cancer and diabetes

  • People who spend more than six hours sitting each day are at higher risk of cancer, heart disease and diabetes
  • Office workers and drivers in particular danger of suffering from poor health
By Jenny Hope
|

Stand up if you want to stay healthy, warn researchers.

A study says office workers could be risking their health simply by sitting at their desk for hours at a time.

It found people who spend more than four hours a day sitting down are at greater risk of chronic illnesses such as cancer, diabetes and heart disease.

Those sitting for at least six hours were significantly more likely to have diabetes.

The research involved 63,048 middle-aged men but US scientists say the findings are likely to also apply to women.

Glued to the desk: Men who sat for more than six hours a day significantly increase their risk of cancer and diabetes
Glued to the desk: Men who sat for more than six hours a day significantly increase their risk of cancer and diabetes
 
Professor Richard Rosenkranz, who led the study at Kansas State University, said the more people sat, the bigger the health problems.

He said ‘We saw a steady stair-step increase in risk of chronic diseases the more participants sat.
‘The group sitting more than eight hours clearly had the highest risk.’ The latest study follows research last year on 222,000 people which found sitting down too long increases your risk of dying within three years, even among the physically active.

There is growing evidence which suggests too much sitting - as opposed to insufficient activity - may be a new risk factor for premature death and illness.

The latest study, published in the International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity, looked at the health of men aged 45 to 65 from New South Wales, Australia, who sat less than four hours a day, four to six hours, six to eight hours and more than eight hours.

Even being physically active may not undo the damage of sitting for long periods
Even being physically active may not undo the damage of sitting for long periods
 
Compared with those who reported sitting four hours or less a day, those who sat for more than four hours a day were significantly more likely to report having a chronic disease such as cancer, diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure.

The chance of suffering a chronic disease increased as participants indicated they sat more. Those sitting for at least six hours were significantly more likely to report having diabetes.

Researchers discovered consistent findings in those who had a similar physical activity level, age, income, education, weight and height.

Participants who sat more reported more chronic diseases, even if they had a similar body mass index (BMI) to those who sat less.

Prof Rosenkranz said the findings sent a warning to office workers sitting at desks for long periods as well as other jobs such as taxi and lorry drivers.

He said ‘We know with very high confidence that more physically active people do better with regard to chronic disease compared with less physically active people, but we should also be looking at reducing sitting.

‘A lot of office jobs that require long periods of sitting may be hazardous to your health because of inactivity and the low levels of energy expenditure.’

There has been growing interest in the downsides of prolonged sitting, which could be both a marker for a sedentary lifestyle and an independent risk factor.

Previous research found people who watch six hours of TV a day cut short their lifespan by five years compared with someone who watches no TV.

People who sit for longer have bigger waist sizes, and higher levels of cholesterol, blood sugar and triglycerides.

The average adult spends 90 per cent of their leisure time sitting down and less than half of adults meet World Health Organisation physical activity recommendations.

In the UK, adults are urged to do 150 minutes of activity a week to promote health.

Prof Rosenkranz said ‘It’s not just that people aren’t getting enough physical activity, but it’s that they’re also sitting too much. And on top of that, the more you sit, the less time you have for physical activity.’

The study focused on men because they have higher rates of diabetes and heart disease, but the findings ‘probably’ apply to women too, he said.

Little is known about children and sitting with regard to chronic disease.

The research is part of the 45 and Up Study, the largest long-term study of aging in Australia, involving more than 267,000 people.

Researchers said that although most of the current evidence is suggestive of a causal connection, they cannot be certain in this study whether volumes of sitting time led to the development of chronic diseases or whether the chronic diseases influenced sitting time.

Prof Rosenkranz said ‘It’s a classic case of, which came first - the chicken or the egg?


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2281024/Sitting-desk-hours-day-dramatically-increases-risk-cancer-diabetes.html#ixzz2LWuMnd13
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Hot food off Plastic plates....

Eating hot food off plastic plates can increase the risk of kidney stones

  • Heating melamine crockery may harm health 
  • Acidic foods can also encourage cheap or old melamine products to contaminate food
By Anna Hodgekiss
|

Its is a favourite of parents and picnic-goers the world over. But new research suggests that eating hot meals on melamine crockery could actually be harmful to health. 

Taiwanese researchers have found that hot temperatures increase the amount of melamine we are exposed to - and this can increase the risk of kidney stones.

They studied two groups of people who ate piping hot noodle soup. One group ate from melamine bowls, the other from ceramic bowls.

People who eat hot food (such as noodle soup) from melamine bowls may increase their risk of kidney stones
People who eat hot food (such as noodle soup) from melamine bowls may increase their risk of kidney stones

Urine samples were collected before the meal, and every two hours for 12 hours following the meal.

Three weeks later, the volunteers consumed the same kind of soup but the type of bowl they used was reversed. Urine samples were collected again. 

Total melamine levels in urine for 12 hours after eating the soup was 8.35 micrograms when the participants ate out of the melamine bowls versus about 1.3 micrograms when they ate out of ceramic bowls. 

Lead researcher by Chia-Fang Wu, of Kaohsiung Medical University in Taiwan, said: 'Melamine tableware may release large amounts of melamine when used to serve high-temperature foods.'

Previous research has found a link between melamine and kidney stones (pictured) in both children and adults
Previous research has found a link between melamine and kidney stones (pictured) in both children and adults

He noted that both higher temperatures (from hot soups, for example) or more acidic foods can encourage melamine to contaminate food, especially in older or low-quality kitchenware. 

But he added that the amount of melamine released into food and beverages from melamine tableware varies by brand, so the results of this study of one brand may not be generalised to other brands.

However the results suggest it is advisable to serve hot food on ceramic crockery, to be on the safe side. 

They added that it's not yet clear what effect all of this might have on human health. However, prior studies have linked chronic, low-dose melamine exposures to an increased risk for kidney stones in both children and adults, the researchers said. 

The findings back up previous research that found a link between melamine and kidney stones in both children and adults.

Studies of melamine toxicity in animals indicate that ingestion can cause kidney stones, kidney damage and may induce cancer.

And in 2008, melamine-tainted baby formula (causing an especially high dose) was linked to six deaths and 50,000 hospitalizations related to kidney stones and kidney disease in China.

The study was published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2266472/Eating-hot-food-plastic-plates-increase-risk-kidney-stones.html#ixzz2IoYYWwrN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Monday, January 21, 2013

Choosing a good password

How bad spelling and grammar could be the key to choosing a good password

  • Researchers say that good grammar makes passwords far easier to crack
  • Warn against using sentences as passwords
By Mark Prigg
|
Birthdays, pet names and your place of birth are already huge no-nos when choosing a secure password.

But researchers said today that the key to finding more secure passwords could be straightforward - just don't use good grammar or spelling.

Ashwini Rao and colleagues at Carnegie Mellon University researched the current generation of password cracking systems.

Researchers say that spelling mistakes and bad grammar can actually be an advantage in passwords, making them harder to crack
Researchers say that spelling mistakes and bad grammar can actually be an advantage in passwords, making them harder to crack

They found that many people, on being asked to choose longer passwords, made them just as easy to guess.

'Use of long sentence-like or phrase-like passwords such as 'abiggerbetterpassword' and 'thecommunistfairy' is increasing,' the researchers say in their paper, due to be presented at the Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy in San Antonio, Texas, next month.
 
The researchers say that other types of familiar structures like postal addresses, email addresses and URLs may also make for less secure passwords, even if they are long.

They say bad grammar can make a huge difference, as hackers are increasingly searching for passwords using correct grammar and spellings in 'brute force' attacks that simply run through combinations of words in a dictionary.

Incorrect spelling and grammar can fool many of these attacks, the team found.

Misspelling your passwords is actually a big advantage, researchers have found (as long as you can remember it)
Misspelling your passwords is actually a big advantage, researchers have found (as long as you can remember it)

'Using an analytical model based on Parts-of-Speech tagging we show that the decrease in search space due to the presence of grammatical structures can be as high as 50%. '
They found that in general, asking users for longer passwords didn't work.

'A significant result of our work is that the strength of long passwords does not increase uniformly with length,' they said.

The team also developed an algorithm to improve the cracking of long passwords.

CHOOSING A SAFE PASSWORD

 Research firm SplashData suggests making passwords more secure with these tips:

  • Use passwords of eight characters or more with mixed types of characters.
  • For example, 'eat cake at 8!' or 'car_park_city?'
  • Avoid using the same username/password combination for multiple websites.
  • Especially risky is using the same password for entertainment sites that you do for online email, social networking, and financial services.

Einstein

Socrates

Confucious

 

blogger templates 3 columns | Make Money Online